|
Denver CBD, Tech Center & Urban Area
Commuting Profile: 2000
|
WORK TRIP MARKET SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area |
Total |
Car Alone |
Car Pool |
Transit |
Bike |
Walk |
Other |
Home |
Downtown |
100.0% |
62.2% |
12.4% |
21.3% |
0.7% |
3.2% |
0.8% |
0.2% |
Tech Center |
100.0% |
88.0% |
9.0% |
1.0% |
0.1% |
0.5% |
0.5% |
0.9% |
Total Centers |
100.0% |
72.7% |
11.0% |
13.0% |
0.5% |
2.1% |
0.6% |
0.5% |
Balance of Urban Area |
100.0% |
110.1% |
17.0% |
3.8% |
0.6% |
3.0% |
1.1% |
7.5% |
Urban Area |
100.0% |
100.0% |
15.4% |
6.3% |
0.6% |
2.8% |
1.0% |
5.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WORK TRIPS (ONE WAY) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area |
Total |
Car Alone |
Car Pool |
Transit |
Bike |
Walk |
Other |
Home |
Downtown |
126,000 |
78,400 |
15,600 |
26,800 |
900 |
4,000 |
1,000 |
300 |
Tech Center |
86,500 |
76,100 |
7,800 |
900 |
100 |
400 |
400 |
800 |
Total Centers |
212,500 |
154,500 |
23,400 |
27,700 |
1,100 |
4,400 |
1,300 |
1,100 |
Balance of Urban Area |
574,100 |
632,200 |
97,500 |
21,900 |
3,300 |
17,500 |
6,500 |
42,800 |
Urban Area |
786,700 |
786,700 |
120,900 |
49,600 |
4,400 |
21,900 |
7,900 |
43,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMPLOYMENT MARKET SHARE & DENSITY |
TRANSIT COMMUTING |
|
Area |
Employment |
Share of Urban Area Employment |
Land Area |
Employment Density |
Transit Commuters |
Transit Work Trip Market Share |
Share of Urban Area Transit Commuters |
Rail Transit? |
Downtown |
126,000 |
16.0% |
1.53 |
82,353 |
26,800 |
21.3% |
54.0% |
YES |
Tech Center |
86,500 |
11.0% |
10.50 |
8,238 |
900 |
1.0% |
1.8% |
NO |
Total Centers |
212,500 |
27.0% |
12.03 |
17,664 |
27,700 |
13.0% |
55.8% |
|
Balance of Urban Area |
574,100 |
73.0% |
486.80 |
1,179 |
21,900 |
3.8% |
44.2% |
|
Urban Area |
786,700 |
100.0% |
498.83 |
1,577 |
49,600 |
6.3% |
100.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data from US Bureau of the Census: CTPP, 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rounded to nearest 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: Taxi, motorcycle and other. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urban Area Data employment uses employee residential data (urban area data not available by work location). Residential data is generally reflective of employment data at the urban area level) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market share data not comparable to 1990 due to boundary differences. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downtown Census Tracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tech Center Census Tracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To facilitate the ideal of government as the servant of the people
by identifying and implementing strategies to achieve public purposes
at a cost that is no higher than necessary.
|
(c) 1994-2006 www.publicpurpose.com --- Wendell Cox Consultancy (Demographia) --- Permission granted to use with attribution.
|
|